Discussion 1: Multiple Levels of Scriptural Interpretation

Posted by:

|

On:

|

BIBLICAL INTERPRETATION SERIES: PART 1

[Click here for the companion YouTube video]

There are many theories about how Scripture should be interpreted. Some maintain that Scripture only has a literal sense (i.e., what the author intended to communicate to the intended audience). Others believe that there are often spiritual interpretations in addition to the literal interpretation. A famous interpretation method (i.e., a hermeneutic) is the Quadriga (“chariot drawn by four horses”). In this method, each verse contains a literal meaning and three possible spiritual meanings. Possible spiritual meanings include the allegorical (the gospel-centered meaning that points to Christ), the tropological (the moral meaning of how to think and act), and the anagogical (what we should hope for in light of the text). The following readings are taken from The Christian Theology Reader by Allister McGrath (5th ed., 2017). The short reading from Clement was the origination of the Quadriga. The reading from Origin likens scriptural interpretation to the body, soul, and spirit of a person.

CLEMENT OF ALEXANDRIA ON THE FOURFOLD INTERPRETATION OF SCRIPTURE

Background: In this extract from the Stromata, Clement (c.150–c.215) succinctly sets out the fundamental principle that there are four senses (or meanings) of Scripture: a literal sense and three additional spiritual senses.

Reading: The meaning of the law is to be understood by us in three ways [in addition to its literal sense]: as displaying a sign, as establishing a command for right conduct, or as making known a prophecy.

ORIGEN ON THE THREE WAYS OF READING SCRIPTURE

Background: The Alexandrian theologian Origen (c.185–c.254), is widely regarded as one of the early church’s most influential and creative interpreters of Scripture. Origen here uses the imagery of “body, soul, and spirit” to distinguish three different ways in which Scripture may be read, according to the maturity of the reader in question.

Reading: There are three ways in which the meaning of the Holy Scriptures should be inscribed on the soul of every Christian. First, the simpler sort are edified by what may be called the “body” of Scripture. This is the name I give to the immediate acceptance. Secondly, those who have made some progress are edified by, as it were, the “soul.” Thirdly, the perfect […] are edified by the “spiritual” Law, which contains the shadow of the good things to come. Thus just as a human being consists of body, soul, and spirit, so also does the Scripture which is the gift of God designed for human salvation. […] Some parts of Scripture have no “body.” In these parts, we must look only for the “soul” and “spirit.” Perhaps this is the point of the description in John’s gospel of the water-pots “for the purifying of the Jews, holding two or three measures” (John 2: 6). The Word implies by this that the apostle calls the Jews in secret, so that they may be purified through the word of the Scripture which sometimes holds two measures, that is what one may call the “soul” and “spirit”; sometimes three, that is, the “body” as well. […] The usefulness of the “body” is testified by the multitude of simple believers and is quite obvious. Paul gives us many examples of the “soul.” […] The spiritual interpretation belongs to people who are able to explain the way in which the worship of the “Jews after the flesh” (1 Corinthians 10: 18) yields images and “shadows of heavenly things” (Hebrews 8: 5) and how the “Law had the shadow of good things to come.”

7 responses to “Discussion 1: Multiple Levels of Scriptural Interpretation”

  1. Ron Nelson Avatar
    Ron Nelson

    Greetings brothers!

    Rich, thank you for your efforts to create a fellowship platform around theology discussions!

    Interpreting the Bible. Huge, important subject! I will never recover from what I believe are the truths that God our Creator is hidden, but has communicated to us through a book, and the stories in this book. So because I believe these to be true, this book and its stories have become a very significant focus of my life. They have enveloped, informed, and transformed my life!

    So, how do I, how do we, understand this book and God’s message?

    I will very briefly share my experience and testimony: I came to Christ in a deep valley and in great need, and I received the Bible simply as God’s message to me. I was then “born of the Spirit”, and the reality of my fundamental spiritual nature was opened to me for the first time. So I sat before the Bible, and heard to the voice of my Creator, who is a spirit, for the first time. It was a profound, life changing experience!

    Later I attended seminary with the goal of simply getting to know Christ better through getting to know the Bible, His message to me, better. Interestingly, now I still approach the Bible the same way I did before attending seminary. I sit before it and listen, because when I go to His Word, I find God there.

    So…am I interested to discuss Bible interpretation? Am I open to considering new, and old, ideas about how to interpret scripture? Absolutely! But I thought it would be good to share my background with this subject as I approach it with you anew. I will look forward to hearing yours, too!

    As I read the passages Rich shared above, the idea that meaning from the scriptures comes on multiple levels resonates with me. These came to mind: “God is a spirit, and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and in truth.” Jn 4:24. “It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh profits nothing. The words I have spoken to you are spirit, and they are life.” Jn 6:63. “But the natural man does not accept the things of God does not accept the things of the Spirit of God; for he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually understood.” 1 Cor 2:14. “Your word is a lamp to my feet, and a light to my path.” Ps 119:105. As I approach scripture, there has been a practical side to it: I find knowledge, wisdom, and receive God’s direction for conduct, behavior, and decision making that is pleasing to Him. But then I find I am getting to know Him better on a spiritual level also. These often seem to occur simultaneously.

    Be blessed today, brothers!
    Ron

    1. Richard Avatar
      Richard

      Thanks so much for your personal story, Ron. I love the verses you cite. Jn 4:24 is the rallying cry not just for biblical interpretation, but for the study of theology in general. Jn 6:36 is an interesting one, as it is often used to critique historical-critical methods of biblical interpretation, with the idea that proper biblical interpretation for believing Christians can never happen without the guidance of the Holy Spirit, at least for spiritual interpretations. In the last 20 years, there has been a move away from historical-critical methods and towards “theological interpretation,” which is essentially church-centric. This is the area we will be exploring in the upcoming weeks.

  2. Kraig Stanforth Avatar
    Kraig Stanforth

    Interpretation of Scripture has been in the history of the church a focal point of division. The Orthodox relies heavily on Origen which reflects its dualism ( spiritual and physical) in interpretation. Roman Catholic interpretation reflects the western church fathers such as Jerome and Augustine – both of these churches believe that Bible can only be interpreted thru the church and thru tradition.

    Protestantism is free for all. You can get 10 different interpretations of a passage depending on the where the reader or speakers theology lies ( Calvinist, pre or post millennial, free will , pentacostal, …. The list goes on) Where does one begin?

    I suppose we should all begin with passages that we all agree on the plain interpretation and can agree theologically- The deity of Christ – the death burial and resurrection- exnihilo creation of the world .. The Trinity.

    1. Richard Avatar
      Richard

      Thanks for these insights, Kraig. There is actually a small Eastern Orthodox church near Crossroads (St. Tikhon Orthodox Christian Mission) that does services mostly in English. I went for a service there and it is quite an experience – like a Roman Catholic mass, but everything chanted and a big focus on icons. Your last point about what we all can agree on is right on point, and is essentially the “Rule of Faith” hermeneutic. Check out this video if you get a chance. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9V8lKlVQEug

  3. Shawn Wilson Avatar
    Shawn Wilson

    Hello Rich, Shawn Wilson here. Reading your summarization of this study has given me quite an interest. My absolute lack of knowledge on these varied ways of reasoning and applying text to my growth and understanding of my relationship with God through Jesus the Christ. I do hope that I am capable of keeping up with this study. Let us Pray! I had understood that start time would be at 9 am but I will have no problem seeing you @ 7:30. Thank you for all of your efforts. Meeting at coffe house. Gotcha

  4. Daniel Roysden Avatar
    Daniel Roysden

    In our exegesis classes we were always warned of conducting “extra-Jesus” interpretation — forcing a spiritualization of Scripture. While I agree with the Holy Spirit enlightening interpretation and the application of Scripture to life, it is also crucial to discuss with other believers such interpretation to ensure faithful interpretation. Are there Scriptures that only should be understood at face value (the long lists of genealogies and persons in various books such as the lists of returned exiles in Nehemiah) — no extra spiritual interpretation? Does going beyond such understanding insult the Spirit by claiming something to be true that is not true — think cults and heresies?

    1. Richard Avatar
      Richard

      Great insight, Daniel. I love the term, “extra-Jesus,” which is essentially a cute term for eisegesis. You make a great point about heresies. They were all mostly led by pious people who used Scripture to defend their beliefs. That is why I like theology so much. What does Scripture as a whole teach about a topic? Not just cherry picking and proof texting. I have heard it called using Scripture to interpret Scripture.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *